[RADIATOR] Slow Response to the NAS Clients

M P antmtp at hotmail.com
Wed Mar 25 20:59:29 CST 2009


Hello Martin,

> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:37:02 +0000
> From: mvb at sanger.ac.uk
> To: radiator at open.com.au
> Subject: Re: [RADIATOR] Slow Response to the NAS Clients
> 
> In my experience "Bad Authenticator" messages are normally down to a
> mismatch in the shared secret for the NAS.  Might be worth checking that
> you don't have a typo in the shared secret on either side.
In which side you mean?
I have noticed that if the Accounting-Request starts with the following lines:
---Code:       Accounting-RequestIdentifier: 77Authentic:  <0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0>---
The Accounting-Response will have similar to the following lines:
---Code:       Accounting-ResponseIdentifier: 77Authentic:  <143><225>a<217><9><142>W<133><15><173><167>&.;<252><174>Attributes:
Wed Mar 25 10:18:23 2009: WARNING: Bad authenticator received in reply to ID 77---

But if the Authentic line is other than <0> on the Accounting-Request then the Accounting-Response does not have a bad authenticator warning message.
Thank you in advance.
_________________________________________________________________
What can you do with the new Windows Live? Find out
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/default.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.open.com.au/pipermail/radiator/attachments/20090326/74bd8a7f/attachment.html>


More information about the radiator mailing list