[RADIATOR] [IPv6] Issues with Framed-Interface-Id assignment

Eddie Stassen estassen at gmail.com
Mon Aug 22 09:39:50 CDT 2011


Hi Elias,

My earlier reply did not go to the list, so here it is again:

Your NAS is correctly interpreting the attribute, the Radiator
dictionary is wrong.  Framed-Interface-Id is not a string type, but a
64 bit number. See rfc3162.  I don't know if Radiator has a built in
type to support this attribute, so you may have to define it as
binary.

Eddie

PS.  To the list admin - can we not have a 'Reply-To' field in the
mail header so that replies get sent to the list by default?

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Elias <akelias at tm.net.my> wrote:
> Thanks Martin. Our NAS is always assigning this value as 3130:3a31:3a31:3a31
> (using the Hex representation as you pointed out) instead of 10:1:1:1. Will
> check with our NAS vendor then. Thanks!
>
>
> On 08/21/2011 11:45 PM, Martin Burton wrote:
>
> On 21/08/2011 15:21, Elias wrote:
>
> AVP: l=10  t=Framed-Interface-Id(96): 31303a313a313a31
>
> That's just the raw hex representation of the ASCII string
>
> 31 = 1
> 30 = 0
> 3a = :
>
> so, 10:1:1:1 as expected.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> radiator mailing list
> radiator at open.com.au
> http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator
>
> _______________________________________________
> radiator mailing list
> radiator at open.com.au
> http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator
>


More information about the radiator mailing list