(RADIATOR) Threading support (again)

[Martin Wallner]

Robert, 

I don't know the Cisco version of a LB too exact, but shouldn't there be
a layer 4 based version of the farm? (RADWARE called them once
Superfarms, now it's 'Layer 4 Policy', that you set up farms with?)...
That makes it possible to balance differently on a per port number
base...

=mw=
 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-radiator at open.com.au [mailto:owner-radiator at open.com.au] On
Behalf Of Robert Blayzor
Sent: Dienstag, 28. August 2007 13:08
To: Hugh Irvine
Cc: radiator at open.com.au
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Threading support (again)

Hugh Irvine wrote:
> You are better off using different port numbers for your Radiator 
> instances, rather than multiple IP addresses.


Unfortunately in IOS SLB I can't easily load balance one service over
multiple ports on the same "real server".  Real servers are specified by
IP, not port, and the vservers are sets of "real servers".

--
Robert Blayzor
INOC
rblayzor at inoc.net
http://www.inoc.net/~rblayzor/

The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of my employer,
not necessarily mine, and probably not necessary.

--
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on radiator-announce at open.com.au To unsubscribe, email
'majordomo at open.com.au' with 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the
message.

--
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on radiator-announce at open.com.au
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo at open.com.au' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.