(RADIATOR) performance : 3.8 vs 3.13

[Hugh Irvine]

Salut Laurent -

The performance differences between these versions should be minimal.

We generally recommend using a load-balancer in front of multiple  
Radiator hosts, each one running two instances: one for  
authentication and the other for accounting. This approach scales  
quite well and is relatively easy to maintain.

regards

Hugh


On 6 Oct 2005, at 16:41, PREVOSTO, Laurent wrote:

> Bonjour,
>
>
>
>  the following question may sound stupid but you never know :
>
> I have 3.8 proxy instances that begin to be really loaded.
>
> Upgrading to 3.13, should I see an increase in performance or are  
> the differences just  bugfixes and new features ?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Laurent
>
>


NB:

Have you read the reference manual ("doc/ref.html")?
Have you searched the mailing list archive (www.open.com.au/archives/ 
radiator)?
Have you had a quick look on Google (www.google.com)?
Have you included a copy of your configuration file (no secrets),
together with a trace 4 debug showing what is happening?

-- 
Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
anywhere. Available on *NIX, *BSD, Windows, MacOS X.
-
Nets: internetwork inventory and management - graphical, extensible,
flexible with hardware, software, platform and database independence.
-
CATool: Private Certificate Authority for Unix and Unix-like systems.


--
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on radiator-announce at open.com.au
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo at open.com.au' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.