(RADIATOR) AuthBy in an Accounting-Request

[Dave Kitabjian]

If that's truly all it does in this scenario, I would think that we can
get rid of the AuthBy and replace it with:
 
    AccountingHandled
    
    http://www.open.com.au/radiator/ref.html#pgfId=363868
 
Am I right?
 
Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Trout [mailto:MatthewTrout at businessserve.co.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:19 PM
To: Dave Kitabjian; radiator at open.com.au
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) AuthBy in an Accounting-Request



I believe you still need something to return a packet to register the
logging; we just use an AuthBy TEST clause to do so. There may be a
cleaner way to do this (since TEST generates a line in the logfile every
time); if there is, would someone care to enlighten me?

> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Dave Kitabjian [mailto:dave at netcarrier.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:43 PM 
> To: radiator at open.com.au 
> Subject: (RADIATOR) AuthBy in an Accounting-Request 
> 
> 
> Given the following: 
> 
>       <Handler Request-Type = Accounting-Request> 
>         
>               ... 
> 
>             AuthBy  LDAP_SERVER_1 
> 
>       </Handler> 
> 
> am I correct in assuming that the AuthBy specifier would be completely

> ignored and irrelevant since no Access-Requests will ever be handled 
> here? 
> 
> Dave 
> === 
> Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/ 
> Announcements on radiator-announce at open.com.au 
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo at open.com.au' with 
> 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message. 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.open.com.au/pipermail/radiator/attachments/20030219/5c152b29/attachment.html>