(RADIATOR) AuthBy in an Accounting-Request
Matthew Trout
MatthewTrout at businessserve.co.uk
Wed Feb 19 11:19:00 CST 2003
I believe you still need something to return a packet to register the
logging; we just use an AuthBy TEST clause to do so. There may be a cleaner
way to do this (since TEST generates a line in the logfile every time); if
there is, would someone care to enlighten me?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Kitabjian [mailto:dave at netcarrier.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:43 PM
> To: radiator at open.com.au
> Subject: (RADIATOR) AuthBy in an Accounting-Request
>
>
> Given the following:
>
> <Handler Request-Type = Accounting-Request>
>
> ...
>
> AuthBy LDAP_SERVER_1
>
> </Handler>
>
> am I correct in assuming that the AuthBy specifier would be completely
> ignored and irrelevant since no Access-Requests will ever be handled
> here?
>
> Dave
> ===
> Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
> Announcements on radiator-announce at open.com.au
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo at open.com.au' with
> 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.open.com.au/pipermail/radiator/attachments/20030219/ced6ba9d/attachment.html>
More information about the radiator
mailing list