(RADIATOR) Exactly the Opposite

[Frank Danielson]

If I understand section 13.1.6 of the manual correctly you could add a check 
item of Auth-Type = Reject for the users in the DBFILE or if all of the users 
in that database are to be rejected, just put the check item for the DEFAULT 
user.

>===== Original Message From "Jon Snyder" <jon at pdx.edu> =====
>Anyone know of a simple way I might have overlooked to invert the sense of
>an AuthBy?
>
>AcceptIfMissing is part of this, but what I'm after is more of
>"RejectIfFound"--I want to reject users if they are in a DBFILE.  I have
>hacked this by putting a bogus User-Password into the dbm and using
>AcceptIfMissing, but it would be nice if there were a way to have an AuthBy
>do everything it was going to do, then have a keyword to swap ACCEPT and
>REJECT when it was finished.
>
>_______________________________
>Jon Snyder
>Computing & Networking Services
>Portland State University
>
>===
>Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
>Announcements on radiator-announce at open.com.au
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo at open.com.au' with
>'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on radiator-announce at open.com.au
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo at open.com.au' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.