(RADIATOR) GRIC and <HOST> clause
Craig Gittens
cgittens at sunbeach.net
Wed Dec 18 08:48:37 CST 2002
Hi,
I was just wondering if this would work since I define my Clients in a SQL
DB and the NAS clients are going to be the same for all dialup parties.
(Your GRIC example in the Ref Manual assumes you have a different client
defined for the GRIC customers.)
<Realm DEFAULT>
<AuthBy RADIUS>
<Host a.b.c.d>
Secret xxxxxxxx
IgnoreAcctSignature (This isn't included in the Ref Manual as being a
valid entry here....)
</Host>
</AuthBy>
</Realm>
I somehow don't think this will work since it is a client clause and not a
radius clause so how do I work around my NAS and IgnoreAcctSignature? If I
included it in the SQL table would it make a difference for my regular
realms? I read the REF guide on this flag but I am a bit daft and don't
understand the implications of it being put in for a NAS that DOESN'T need
it.
Craig.
===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on radiator-announce at open.com.au
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo at open.com.au' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
More information about the radiator
mailing list