(RADIATOR) Ascend-Data-Filter vs VENDORATTR 529 Ascend-Data-Filter

[Jon Lewis]

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Hugh Irvine wrote:

> Of course a much cleaner solution is to use cisco-avpair's to do the
> filtering properly.

I tested that way just to make sure it would work, but my impression
(given the outsourced ports providers we've dealt with) is that
Ascend-Data-Filter is a more accepted and widely understood/supported
filter format than the cisco-avpair method.  I'd rather have one filter
for everyone than have to configure cisco-avpair filters for on-net
customers and Ascend-Data-Filter filters for outsourced ports using
customers.

It sounds like the best solution for us is to just comment out all those
new VENDORATTR 529 entries in the dictionary.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis                   |  I route
 Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________

--
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on radiator-announce at open.com.au
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo at open.com.au' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.