(RADIATOR) Stop packets problem
Hugh Irvine
hugh at open.com.au
Wed Oct 29 15:31:01 CST 2003
Hello Rodolfo -
Missing stop packets are always a problem when trying to enforce
restrictions on simultaneous use.
The first thing to do is establish why the stop packets are missing,
and the usual reasons for this are saturated communications links
(dropped packets), incorrect configuration files, or incorrect NAS
configuration and/or bugs.
You will need to use a network packet dump utility (like tcpdump,
snoop, ethereal, ...) to find out exactly what is happening. The only
"foolproof" method of avoiding problems is to use a session database
and interogate the NAS.
This topic has been discussed many times on the mailing list:
www.open.com.au/archives/radiator
regards
Hugh
On 30/10/2003, at 7:00 AM, Rodolfo Torrado López wrote:
> Hi everybody.
>
> I have Radiator 3.6 over Windows 2K Server.
>
> I am experimenting problems with stop packets (I have not implemented
> , yet, Interrogating to NAS or SessionDatabase): some of them are not
> processed, and the user stay, incorrectly, on line, and they can not
> log on (I use Simultaneous use = 1)
>
> What can I do in order to fix this problem? (for instance enlarge the
> buffer size)
>
> Thanks
>
> Rodolfo
>
NB: have you included a copy of your configuration file (no secrets),
together with a trace 4 debug showing what is happening?
--
Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
anywhere. Available on *NIX, *BSD, Windows, MacOS X.
-
Nets: internetwork inventory and management - graphical, extensible,
flexible with hardware, software, platform and database independence.
-
CATool: Private Certificate Authority for Unix and Unix-like systems.
===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on radiator-announce at open.com.au
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo at open.com.au' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
More information about the radiator
mailing list