(RADIATOR) Add-reply-attribute based on calling-station-id

Hugh Irvine hugh at open.com.au
Fri May 2 02:53:07 CDT 2003


Hello Sebasian -

Yes the ReplyHook does work within the AuthBy SQLRADIUS clause (I have 
used it myself).

If you send me the configuration file (no secrets), the hook code and 
the trace 4 debug I will take a look.

regards

Hugh


On Friday, May 2, 2003, at 16:39 Australia/Melbourne, Sebastian Filzek 
wrote:

>> You will probably need to use a ReplyHook for this.
>>
>> There is an example ReplyHook in the file "goodies/hooks.txt".
>
> I've been trying to use a ReplyHook.
>
> I'm using AuthBy SQLRADIUS.  I believe maybe the ReplyHook parameter
> is not supported correctly for a authby SQLRADIUS?
>
> I note in the docs it says that AuthBy SQLRADIUS supports all params
> supported by AuthBy RADIUS, but I cant even
> get my ReplyHook to output a debug log message.
>
> Sab.
>
> --
> Sebastian Filzek
> Email: sebastian at filzek.org
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hugh Irvine" <hugh at open.com.au>
> To: <sebastian at filzek.org>
> Cc: <radiator at open.com.au>
> Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 3:02 PM
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Add-reply-attribute based on
> calling-station-id
>
>
>>
>> Hello Sebastian -
>>
>> You will probably need to use a ReplyHook for this.
>>
>> There is an example ReplyHook in the file "goodies/hooks.txt".
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Hugh
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to add a reply attribute to an access-accept packet,
> based
>>> on the
>>> calling-station-id of the access request.  This is simple. However
> I'm
>>> trying
>>> to do it while running auth by radius and the user gets
> authenticated
>>> elsewhere.
>>>
>>> So I see an access-request packet, it contains the information I
> want
>>> to match,
>>> then I forward this by radius to a downstream proxy, they auth the
>>> user and
>>> then I see an access-accept for this user.  It is at this stage
> that I
>>> need to add
>>> a reply attrib (based on some information which I pulled out of
> the
>>> access-
>>> request earlier),  however the only thing linking the
> access-accept to
>>> the
>>> access-request is the proxy-state.
>>>
>>> Any pointers on how to achieve this are greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Sebastian.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sebastian Filzek
>>> Email: sebastian at filzek.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> NB: have you included a copy of your configuration file (no
> secrets),
>> together with a trace 4 debug showing what is happening?
>>
>> --
>> Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
>> anywhere. Available on *NIX, *BSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X.
>> -
>> Nets: internetwork inventory and management - graphical, extensible,
>> flexible with hardware, software, platform and database
> independence.
>>
>> ===
>> Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
>> Announcements on radiator-announce at open.com.au
>> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo at open.com.au' with
>> 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
>
>

NB: have you included a copy of your configuration file (no secrets),
together with a trace 4 debug showing what is happening?

-- 
Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
anywhere. Available on *NIX, *BSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X.
-
Nets: internetwork inventory and management - graphical, extensible,
flexible with hardware, software, platform and database independence.

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on radiator-announce at open.com.au
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo at open.com.au' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.


More information about the radiator mailing list