(RADIATOR) proxy impersonating many NASen :-(

[Neale Banks]

Hi Mariano,

On Wed, 30 May 2001, Mariano Absatz wrote:

[...]
> if you are fiddling with the values of a couple of attributes to generate a 
> unique attribute, it might be far easier to (in the context you describe) 
> generate a NAS-Port-Id (RFC 2869, section 5.17, page 37) or, if all Access-
> Request DO have an Acct-Session-Id (despite Hugh's surprise), use that.

I see the challenge as being more oriented to getting a properly mapped
"$nas_id:$nas_port" space happening.  If I have to pinch a prefix off the
Acct-Session-Id and graft that onto the NAS-Port-Id, then so be it.  But
my prefered solution is to get $nas_id to have a value unique for each
possible NAS (be it NAS-IP-Address or NAS-Identifier).

> In ANY case you are not using NAS-Port, be aware that you can't double-check 
> Simultaneous-Use against the NAS if your SessionDatabase says it's exceeded. 
> If you need to do this, take a look at the patch I sent a few days ago.

Thanks, I'll take a look at that.

Regards,
Neale.

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on radiator-announce at open.com.au
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo at open.com.au' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.