<html><body><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div>Vangelis,<br></div><div><br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div>Yes. But note that requests from these clients will be handled the same way wherever the Identifier is used.<br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div><br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div>Rohan<br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div><br></div><hr id="zwchr" data-marker="__DIVIDER__"><div data-marker="__HEADERS__"><b>From: </b>"Vangelis Kyriakakis" <vkyriak@forthnet.gr><br><b>To: </b>radiator@lists.open.com.au<br><b>Sent: </b>Wednesday, December 28, 2016 7:24:14 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>[RADIATOR] Different clients using the same client Identifier<br></div><div><br></div><div data-marker="__QUOTED_TEXT__">Hello,<br> <br> Can I use the following client configuration (using the same Identifier for different Client definitions)?<br> <br> <Client 1.1.1.1><br> Secret XXXX<br> Identifier <b>client<br> </b>PreHandlerHook File1<br> </Client><br> <br> <Client 2.2.2.2><br> Secret YYYY<br> Identifier <b>client</b><br> PreHandlerHook File2<br> </Client><br> <br> Is this configuration correct?<br> <br> Regards<br> Vangelis<br> <br> <br>_______________________________________________<br>radiator mailing list<br>radiator@lists.open.com.au<br>http://lists.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator<br></div></div></body></html>